Using suspension of disbelief to confront uncertainty

As I have written about in an earlier post, a good story or strong narrative provides a cognitive framework for dealing with uncertainty by offering a sense of direction and purpose, even in the face of unknown outcomes. The cognitive framework shares similarities with the strategic approach, highlighting the connection between constructing narratives and developing strategies.

The power of narratives lies in their ability to suspend one’s disbelief and create a space where we can put logic and critical reasoning aside, immersing ourselves in the story. When we engage with a narrative, we willingly set aside our doubts and temporarily accept the fictional premises presented to us. This suspension of disbelief allows us to enter into the world of the narrative, fully engage with its characters, events, and themes.

In modernist thinking, uncertainty was often viewed as a problem to be solved through rational analysis and objective decision-making. However, post-modern thinking emerged as a response, challenging the notion of certainty and objective truth. It emphasised the subjective nature of human experiences and interpretations, recognising uncertainty as a fundamental aspect of existence rather than a problem to be overcome.

Building upon the ideas of post-modernism, meta-modern thinking now recognises the limitations of objective knowledge and embraces uncertainty as an inherent aspect of human experience. This approach encourages a more flexible and nuanced understanding of uncertainty, allowing for multiple perspectives and the coexistence of conflicting ideas.

Within the realm of meta-modernism, uncertainty is embraced as an opportunity for exploration and the consideration of multiple perspectives. It acknowledges that our understanding of the world is shaped by our social, cultural, and historical contexts. Instead of seeking absolute answers, meta-modern thinking encourages a more nuanced and contextual understanding of uncertainty. In this view, uncertainty becomes a catalyst for creativity, critical thinking, and the emergence of diverse ideas, opening up spaces for dialogue and the coexistence of conflicting viewpoints.

Regardless of our cognitive progression, narratives play a crucial role in helping us make sense of uncertainty by appealing to our emotions and providing a sense of continuity and coherence in our lives. By constructing a narrative that gives meaning and purpose to our experiences, we can navigate uncertainty with greater clarity and resilience.

By suspending our disbelief, we open ourselves up to the possibilities and ideas presented by the narrative. We embrace the fictional world and its rules, even if they are unlikely or impossible in the real world. This act of suspension allows us to fully engage with the story, empathise with the stakeholders, and experience the emotions and ideas the narrative intends to convey. It propels our cognitive progression, deepening our understanding of reality and the nature of uncertainty.

Uncertainty is inherently challenging and unsettling and narratives provide us with a sense of stability and coherence. By embracing the fictional world of the narrative, we find solace and guidance, allowing us to navigate the uncertainties of our own lives.

Moreover, suspension of disbelief invites us to expand our imagination and explore new perspectives. It allows us to venture into realms of possibility that may lie beyond our current understanding. By temporarily setting aside our skepticism, we can entertain new ideas, challenge existing beliefs, and find creative solutions to the uncertainties we encounter.

However, it is important to acknowledge that life is not a neatly structured story, and narratives are not literal templates for how life should unfold. They are tools that we use to make sense of our experiences and find meaning. While the fictional hero’s journey may not perfectly align with the complexities of real life, it still holds value as a narrative framework because it reflects universal themes and patterns found in human experiences.

Still when dealing with the unfolding of reality, you must see it as it is and not explained though a filter of a story. It is crucial to approach narratives with a critical and discerning mindset, recognising that they are tools for interpretation rather than definitive blueprints for life. We can draw inspiration from narratives, learn from their insights, and adapt them to fit our unique circumstances and aspirations.

While narratives serve as powerful strategic tools that can engage and motivate people, it is important to remember that just as a Machiavellian prince, you cannot subject yourself to your own rules. For you, the strategist, the narrative remains just a good story. However, for the ones you address, narratives provide a way to make sense of uncertainty, give legitimacy to authorities, find meaning and comfort while navigating the complexities of life.

Kommentarer

9 responses to “Using suspension of disbelief to confront uncertainty”

  1. AJOwens avatar

    There are resonances here with ideas expressed by the historian of science Jimena Canales in her recent book Bedeviled—specifically, how suspension of disbelief “allows us to venture into realms of possibility that may lie beyond our current understanding.” It’s her view that the demons of science (Maxwell’s, Laplace’s, and many others) represent a similar activity.

    1. Martin Palacios avatar

      Thank you.
      I’m thinking that;

      Strategy is said to be a centralised tool of power making the organisation to behave in a different way as it would in the absent of strategy.

      And it changes nature over time. As cognitive progression changes so does strategy giving legitimacy to power and making sense of uncertainty.

      Suspension of disbelief. Accepting that things are not rational any that there can be something else is really at the core of strategic thinking.

      Two issues in this comes to mind.
      1. How familiar can things new be -or not be- in order to accept a suspension of disbelief?
      2. Setting a strategic narrative also hinders you to see reality as it is. It makes you less good at dealing with the unfolding of reality. Unless it is a narrative about uncertainty itself.

      1. AJOwens avatar

        I thought of this post while watching Disney’s Fantasia last night. Two of the animation sequences, both set to Tchaikovsky’s Nutcracker Suite, depict processes of nature as a dance of the faeries. In one, the faeries awaken the world, spreading the morning dew; in the other, they blanket it with winter’s sleep, turning the leaves to gold and skating frost across the ponds. These are very moving narratives, transforming into a dance what we are usually told is a series of indifferent processes.

        Oddly enough, in the same film, Stravinsky’s Rite of Spring is used to illustrate the cruel story of mindless evolution.

        To address the two issues you have listed, both appeal to familiarity to aid our suspension of disbelief. The first draws on the familiarity of the bedtime story, and the second on the familiarity of the modern scientific narrative circa 1940.

        We may say that one of them hinders our view of reality “as it is.” -But which one?

      2. AJOwens avatar

        I thought I should let you know that I’ve built on this comment at a new blog post, “https://staggeringimplications.wordpress.com/2023/05/23/comparative-disney/”>Comparative Disney. The post mentions your site and quotes your last two articles.

    2. Martin Palacios avatar

      Indeed, exploring alternative, parallell and yet accurate descriptions of reality can be an intriguing and maybe also a thought provoking exercise. In the context of a meta modern view on progression, your insights touch upon several interesting points. Thank you for your post at staggeringimplications! These are my reflections on your reply in relation to this post.

      First, you highlight the challenge of describing reality ”objectively”. A purely clinical description might strip away the nuances and complexities that make up our lived experiences. Reason and probability provide useful frameworks for understanding the unfolding of reality, but they are not infallible predictors of what will happen next. The uncertainty inherent in the nature of reality, as illustrated by Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle, suggests that there are limitations to our ability to measure and predict events with absolute precision.

      Drawing a parallel between measurement and storytelling, you propose that the descriptions of reality lie on a spectrum between ”position” and ”momentum.” Where position refers to a snapshot of reality as it is, while momentum represents its ongoing progression. Stories inherently possess a direction, implying a sense of momentum or unfolding narrative. Understanding the interplay between position and momentum can provide a more comprehensive view of reality.

      Additionally, we both touch the concept of complexity, emphasising that the whole is not merely the sum of its parts but arises from the interactions between those parts. This perspective challenges a reductionist understanding of reality and acknowledges the inherent chaotic nature of the world. Recognising this complexity also highlights the role of storytelling as a tool for making sense of and navigating an unpredictable world. Yet it also nullifies the authority of narratives that ignore the messiness of handling unpredictable events. Describing the world as the sum of its parts are very much a position orientated mode of thinking while viewing it as the interaction of its parts are more a momentum orientated view. While the sum can be completed with a overall arcing storyline. Its interactions forces us to find a narrative that is more closely connected to the actual unfolding of reality.

      In a meta modern perspective, you propose a shift towards a multipolar reality description. This involves embracing a meta storytelling approach that acknowledges the interconnectedness and interdependence of various narratives. I’m thinking that this implies that the antagonist of the story becomes uncertainty itself, as it pervades all aspects of our lives and challenges our ability to predict and control outcomes. Authority, power structures, and agendas align around uncertainty as a central force, shaping the dynamics of the multipolar reality.

      Overall, your thoughts provided insightful reflections for further exploration and invite a deeper examination of how we perceive and describe the unfolding of reality in a complex and uncertain world. Thank you!

      1. AJOwens avatar

        I agree with your comments (and the addition you made in the comments at my blog, about position and momentum corresponding to static and dynamic views of reality). What is striking is the way they refract and relate ideas as through a prism.

        “Reason and probability provide useful frameworks for understanding the unfolding of reality, but they are not infallible predictors of what will happen next.”

        Your mention of infallible prediction brings to mind Laplace’s demon, a being who was capable of perfectly predicting the universe. It is as if reason and probability fall short of achieving an attainable goal. They are fallible with respect to its paradigm. But it is the paradigm we must reconsider, or rather, augment. To understand reality is not a matter of predicting it mathematically. We must also engage it in other ways.

        In high school I was puzzled by the concept of “instantaneous velocity.” Velocity assumes time; it measures changes in position over time. Instantaneity posits the suspension of time. I could not get a mental picture of the movement of something that was supposed to be abstracted from movement. It felt like dividing by zero. And yet the teachers and textbooks seemed unbothered. When I heard much later about the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, which concerns our inability to determine both position and momentum simultaneously, I wasn’t surprised. It seemed like the same problem.

        Modernity takes a rather mechanical view of the world, as if it were parts making up a machine. We are given to thinking of reality as primarily position, with a possibility of momentum. We could equally take a more fluid view of the world as primarily momentum, with a possibility of position.

        You have highlighted the alternative of storytelling as a method of understanding reality. Storytelling is not about predicting the future, so much as imagining possible futures and remembering possible pasts. Storytelling is preparation through rehearsal for the uncertainty of what is to come. It is not a quantitative analysis in pursuit of prediction and control. It is a qualitative appreciation in pursuit of learning how to dance with the world.

  2. Martin Palacios avatar

    I got this article in a comment while posting this blogpost at Linkedin.

    It discusses the concept of play and its significance in games. It argues that games are platforms for collaborative conflict and exploration of possibilities. Play is seen as a means of training ourselves to be flexible, creative, and critical, allowing us to understand things in new ways and transform them into something new. The article emphasises that while games involve conflict, it is always collaborative in nature because all participants voluntarily agree to take part in the game together. The conflict in games is like a theatrical performance, where the audience suspends their disbelief and enjoys the drama without confusing it with reality. The article also explores how games can be a space for individuals to discover and explore different identities, blurring the lines between player and designer. Play is not just a form of entertainment but a way to gain a deeper understanding of oneself and others.

    https://psyche.co/ideas/a-game-is-not-a-game-without-a-special-kind-of-conflict

  3. Martin Palacios avatar

    I also got this video sent to me about metamodern storytelling in movies. https://youtu.be/5xEi8qg266g

  4. […] is a continuation of my last blog post titled “From Doubt to Immersion: Using Suspension of Disbelief to Confront Uncertainty.” In the post, I discuss how suspension of disbelief is a crucial aspect of engaging in storytelling. […]

Leave a Reply to AJOwensCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Discover more from Obrydd Strategic AB

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Discover more from Obrydd Strategic AB

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading